更新时间：2026-08-26 来源：互联网编辑：海董点击数： 7186次

妻子的诱惑

Russia's Ouster From WTO Would Jeopardize West & Global South's Development, Scholars Warn_我的网站

禁闭岛

A | "[O]usting Russia from the WTO would have a number of negative consequences, for Russia, of course, but also for other WTO countries, and even more so for all those countries that to date have been benefiting from the Russian WTO membership, particularly as regards the oil market and a number of industrial or consumer goods," says Sergio Rossi, professor of macroeconomics and monetary economics at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland.,Since its accession to the WTO, Russia has helped integrate Eastern and Asian countries into global trade and contributed to economic growth as well as firms’ profits, notably in those Western countries that imported a lot of Russian oil, iron, and steel, according to Rossi.,"The Russian participation in the WTO enlarged the spectrum of the latter so that it now covers all major economies around the world," the academic emphasizes. "On geopolitical grounds, it also helped counterbalance the US power, contributing to reducing the asymmetries and the monetary dominance of the US dollar at the global level. For the EU, Russia’s participation in the WTO gave rise to two major benefits. On the one hand, the EU member countries have been in a position to increase their exports to Russia, hence also the EU firms’ profits. On the other hand, these countries’ economies benefited from a huge reduction of their importing costs, as regards different trade barriers (tariffs and patents in particular).",The professor notes that Russia's impact on trade and investment within the framework of the WTO has been positive, given that it facilitated the expansion of foreign trade across the global economy, thereby creating jobs and investment opportunities for a number of Western countries.,Similarly, Russia's WTO membership has played a crucial role for the Global South as Moscow has often thrown its weight behind developing countries, highlights Dr. Anuradha Chenoy, professor of the Center for Russian and Central Asian Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University.,"Russia has been a responsible member of the WTO," Chenoy stresses. "On many issues Russia sided with the countries of the Global South, because of rules like ‘Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights’ and patents were not in favor of developing countries. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, India and South Africa proposed an exceptional and temporary waiver on COVID vaccines, which were under patent by Western pharmaceuticals. Many countries of the South backed India and South Africa’s demand. So did Russia. But the Western block did not allow the patent regime to be diluted and big corporate profits continued. Many people in the South could not get the vaccine as a consequence.",RussiaMoscow Calls for Joint Work on Resolving Trade Issues Within WTO to Solve Food Crisis21 May, 18:42 GMT,Russia's Ouster From WTO is Highly Unlikely,The Russian Federation has been a member of WTO since 22 August 2012. Prior to that, it had worked hard for 19 years to meet the organization's requirements. After the beginning of the special operation to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine, Russia was stripped of its "most favored nation" status, with some Western nations calling for the removal of the country from the international entity. However, as Reuters explained back in March, "expelling Russia, which joined the WTO in 2012 after 19 years of negotiations, would be extremely difficult as there is no specific expulsion process.","Ousting Russia from the WTO is not possible under the current WTO Agreement, as it does not encompass such a possibility," says Rossi.,He points out that Russia could be expelled only if two-thirds of the 164 WTO member countries backed such a decision which is highly unlikely. Neither China nor many other countries, including BRICS members, will ever agree to expel Russia "in light of economic advantages these countries benefit from having Russia within the WTO," according to the academic.,For his part, Chenoy underscores that Russia's hypothetical expulsion could create a disturbing precedent which "would be harmful for global trade and the rules-based order and international law.",EconomyUS Attempts 'to Strangle and Cripple' Russian Economy With Sanctions Failed, Russian Ambassador Says19 August, 10:49 GMT,Meanwhile, Russian lawmakers have also weighed the pros and cons of Russia's WTO membership. In April, State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin instructed relevant chamber committees to study the advisability of Russia's presence in the organization. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation and Liberal Democratic Party of Russia advocated for the nation's withdrawal from the WTO, arguing that Russia's accession to the WTO has made the nation's enterprises less competitive than their Western peers and failed to shield the country from Western sanctions.,For his part, Minister of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov argued on May 5 that Russia's exit from the WTO would, in particular, deprive the country of the opportunity to develop new rules for global trade. In addition to that, the WTO still remains an important tool to support Russian exports, the minister wrote in a letter, obtained by Russian media outlet RBC.,Controversies pertaining to the WTO were also discussed by BRICS members during the group's 14th summit in June. The leaders of BRICS states agreed to pursue "the necessary WTO reform" to build an open world economy and called on all WTO members to avoid unilateral and protectionist measures that run counter to the spirit and rules of the WTO.,"This WTO reform is welcome," says Rossi. "This reform should include also an agreement to dispose of the actual international monetary disorder, which is the result of the US dollar dominance that allows the United States to record enormous ‘trade deficits without tears,’ as the French economist Jacques Rueff noticed in the 1950s – that is, shortly after the 1944 Bretton Woods agreements, which put the US dollar at the center of the current international monetary regime. Time has come to get rid of this monetary disorder, which is a factor of financial instability and crises as well as of geopolitical turmoil across the global economy.",RussiaGlobal Power Shifting Away From West, While BRICS Expanding & Increasing Legitimacy14 July, 16:45 GMT,How West Has Shot Itself in the Foot,Meanwhile, the decision of the US, the European Union, Japan, and Canada to strip Russia of its "most favored nation" trade status will have a long-term negative impact on the global economy, according to Rossi.,"The global economy will suffer from this decision, because there will be an increase in the costs of foreign trade for all countries involved," the academic forecasts. "For instance, importing Russian oil and iron in the EU will cost more, as the importing firms will have to pay higher tariffs, which they will transfer to the so-called ‘global value chain’ through a higher mark-up of their own production costs.",As a result, one might expect "a mushroom growth of consumer prices, which – as we can observe now – implies a number of negative consequences for all stakeholders, particularly for the poor and the middle class, but also for small as well as medium-sized firms in Western countries," Rossi notes.,Europe is struggling to tame galloping inflation, which has been further accelerated by the anti-Russia energy embargo. The annual inflation rate in the EU climbed to a record high of 9.8% in July, according to Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union. Likewise, inflation among the Eurozone countries hit a new high of 8.9%. The lowest annual rates were registered in France, Malta (both 6.8%) and Finland (8.0%), while the highest annual rates were recorded in Estonia (23.2%), Latvia (21.3%), and Lithuania (20.9%).,For its part, Russia won't be affected as dramatically as the West, as it is increasingly turning to the East and South, which can be bigger beneficiaries of trade with Russia, who is a prominent supplier of hydrocarbons, commodities, wheat, etc., according to Chenoy. Similarly, Russia's development within the BRICS framework is promising to be beneficial for the country and its partners.,"Countries of the BRICS together have a bigger GDP combined now than the G7 countries," Chenoy notes. "Trade in national currencies, new transport corridors can help the BRICS grow even further."。

B |

　一键部署OpenClaw 随着AI问答和生成式搜索逐渐进入用户的信息获取流程，很多站长开始同时接触SEO与GEO。有人认为GEO只是换了名称的SEO，也有人认为有了AI搜索以后，传统SEO就不再重要。实际上，两者面对的展示场景不同，解决的问题也不完全一样。简单来说： SEO主要解决网页能不能进入搜索结果，GEO主要关注网页内容能不能进入AI生成的答案。 二者不是互相替代，而是网站内容从“被找到”到“被理解”的两个环节。一、SEO主要解决网页能不能被搜索到 SEO是搜索引擎优化，主要围绕网页抓取、索引、排名和点击展开。搜索引擎通常需要先发现网页，再读取页面内容，将其加入索引，最后根据用户搜索的问题决定页面有没有展示机会。

C | 因此，SEO首先解决的是以下问题。 1. 搜索引擎能不能访问页面网站已经上线，不代表搜索引擎一定能够正常访问。常见问题包括：页面被错误屏蔽；网站结构层级过深；内部链接不完整；页面打开速度较慢；重要内容依赖复杂脚本加载；大量页面内容重复。如果搜索引擎无法顺利访问和读取页面，后面的内容优化也很难发挥作用。 2. 搜索引擎能不能判断页面主题有些企业网站的页面标题只有“产品中心”“服务项目”或“解决方案”。这些标题对企业内部人员来说没有问题，但对搜索引擎和第一次访问的用户来说，信息并不清楚。页面需要明确说明：介绍的是什么产品；解决什么问题；适合哪些场景；与其他页面有什么区别。页面主题越明确，搜索系统越容易判断它应该匹配哪些查询。 3. 页面能不能出现在合适的搜索结果中 SEO不只是追求某个关键词出现次数，而是让页面内容与用户的搜索需求保持一致。例如，用户搜索“企业网站改版前需要准备什么”，更希望看到准备清单、改版步骤和注意事项，而不是一篇反复介绍公司服务的宣传文章。标题写了什么，正文就应该真正回答什么。 4. 用户看到结果后愿不愿意点击网页进入搜索结果以后，标题和摘要会直接影响用户判断。过于宽泛的标题不容易说明内容价值，过度夸张的标题又可能降低信任。相比“网站优化的几大技巧”，下面这种表达会更加具体：企业网站有收录却没有访问，可能需要检查哪些问题？ SEO解决的不只是技术收录，也包括网页怎样在搜索结果中清楚展示。二、GEO主要解决内容能不能进入AI答案 GEO一般指生成式引擎优化。传统搜索通常展示多个网页链接，让用户自行选择；生成式搜索则可能先检索多个来源，再把信息整理成一段答案。

D | GEO研究关注的核心，是内容在生成式答案中的可见度、引用情况和表达方式。

E | 因此，GEO需要解决另一类内容展示问题。 1. AI能不能准确理解网站内容不少企业在不同页面使用了不同的业务描述。首页说自己是软件开发企业，文章中说是数字化服务商，其他平台又重点介绍网站建设。这些说法可能都与业务有关，但缺少统一的信息后，AI很难判断哪一项才是企业的核心定位。

F | GEO首先需要整理清楚：企业主要提供什么；面向哪些用户；解决哪些问题；产品和服务之间是什么关系；哪些信息长期保持不变。2. 内容中有没有可以直接提取的答案很多网站文章看起来篇幅很长，但真正有用的信息很少。

G | 例如，正文反复出现“专业服务”“全面提升”“高效赋能”等表达，却没有说明服务流程、适用场景和注意事项。当用户向AI询问具体问题时，这类内容很难被整理成有效答案。

H | 更加适合被理解的内容通常会清楚回答：是什么；适合谁；怎样操作；有哪些步骤；存在哪些限制；选择时要注意什么。

I | 3. 不同来源的信息是否一致 AI生成答案时，可能会参考官网、媒体文章、行业平台、问答页面和其他公开来源。如果不同来源中的公司名称、产品介绍、成立时间或服务范围互相冲突，最终答案就可能出现偏差。因此，GEO不只是写一篇新文章，还包括检查旧内容，减少公开信息之间的矛盾。 4. 内容有没有明确依据带有数据、来源、时间和具体条件的内容，通常比空泛结论更容易验证。例如，不要只写“网站加载速度非常重要”，还可以说明：检查的是哪个页面；使用什么工具测试；测试时间是什么时候；发现了哪些具体问题；调整前后发生了什么变化。 GEO仍是一个快速发展的领域，不同生成式平台的检索和引用方式存在差异，目前也没有一种方法能够稳定保证内容在所有AI答案中出现。三、SEO与GEO解决问题的区别 SEO更关注以下环节：页面能不能被抓取；内容能不能被收录；页面能不能获得搜索展示；标题能不能吸引点击；用户进入后能不能继续浏览。 GEO更关注以下环节：内容能不能被准确理解；品牌信息是否保持一致；页面有没有明确答案；内容有没有引用价值；AI生成答案时会不会错误表达。可以把两者理解为： SEO帮助网页进入搜索结果，GEO帮助信息进入生成式答案。

J | 四、为什么只做其中一项还不够如果网站没有做好基础SEO，页面无法被发现、抓取或索引，那么内容再清楚，也可能缺少稳定的公开入口。如果网站只考虑SEO排名，却没有清晰的内容结构，页面即使获得访问，也可能难以被用户和AI快速理解。一个完整的内容展示过程通常包括：搜索系统发现网页；系统理解页面主题；页面进入相关结果；用户或AI读取内容；关键信息被整理和使用；用户进入网站继续了解。 SEO更多负责前半段，GEO则更关注内容被理解和引用的环节。五、站长可以怎样同时开展SEO与GEO第一步：先检查网站基础状态先确认网站能否正常访问，重要页面有没有被收录，导航和内部链接是否完整。

K | 不要在技术基础仍存在明显问题时，只增加文章数量。第二步：确定每个页面解决的问题一个页面尽量集中回答一个核心问题。例如：企业网站改版前需要检查什么；产品资料频繁变化怎样减少重复修改；网站有访问却没有咨询可能是什么原因；SEO与GEO分别解决什么展示问题。明确主题比堆积大量相关词语更重要。

L | 第三步：按照用户问题组织内容文章可以采用以下结构：问题是什么；为什么会出现；常见表现有哪些；可以怎样检查；调整时要注意什么。这样的结构既方便普通读者浏览，也便于系统识别文章重点。

M | 第四步：统一重要公开信息检查官网、行业平台和历史文章中的企业介绍。公司名称、业务范围、产品名称和基础信息发生变化后，应及时更新旧页面，避免多个版本长期同时存在。第五步：增加真实、可验证的信息可以适当加入：操作步骤；页面截图；测试过程；参数说明；公开资料来源；实际遇到的问题。不要为了增加篇幅反复改写同一个观点。六、需要避免的几个误区第一个误区是把GEO理解成大量发布AI生成文章。内容数量增加，不代表信息质量提高。

N | 第二个误区是认为只要在文章中反复加入品牌名称，就能被AI推荐。过度重复反而可能影响阅读体验。第三个误区是完全放弃SEO。生成式搜索依然需要获取公开信息，网站的可访问性和内容基础仍然重要。第四个误区是承诺确定结果。无论SEO还是GEO，都受到内容质量、行业竞争、平台机制和用户需求等多种因素影响。

o | 结语 SEO与GEO解决的是不同阶段的内容展示问题。 SEO关注网页能否被发现、收录和展示；GEO关注内容能否被生成式搜索准确理解、引用和表达。对站长来说，没有必要在两者之间二选一。更加实际的做法是先做好网站技术基础和搜索展示，再逐步完善内容结构、品牌信息和事实依据。无论搜索入口怎样变化，真正具有长期价值的内容仍然需要做到： 主题清楚、信息真实、结构合理、便于阅读，并能够解决用户的实际问题。

申请创业报道，分享创业好点子。点击此处，共同探讨创业新机遇！。